| 1 |
 |
“... received and read your Open
Letter. Have just given it a second reading.
"I'm no longer disappointed. Now Im puzzled. How do
you expect so orthodox a document to be published by the
more and more heterodox S. P. press? I was wondering, be-
fore the Open Letter arrived, what scheme you were to pursue
to present orthodoxy in such heterodox garb as to have it slip
through. Now I only wonder how that letter can be accepted.
On this subject and kindred ones I wrote inquiringly to you
in my last letter, and also in one that preceded it, and which
two I expected you to answer jointly. The letter accompany-
ing your Open Letter was evidently sent off before you re-
ceived that one. Shall put no more questions but wait.
The Open Letter is first rate. But how-there, Im go-
ing to ask questions.
I have no suggestions to offer. The argument is cogent
all the way through. It ought to take. There is just one sug-
gestion that occurs to me:
On page 63, or perhaps somewhere before that, it...”
|
|