| 1 |
 |
“...letter, and its tone jus-
tifies the move, you may reply to him suggesting, in view of
the importance of economic clearness and historic accuracy,
that he write to me for an answer to Connollys article, con-
firming or combatting and disproving his contention. Ten to
one Edwards will have good reason to do this. Ten to one
letters will come in on the Connolly article. An unseemly
clapperclaw in The Bulletin may be avoided by a stiff article,
written academically, yet without mincing matters, and stat-
ing the proposition clearly.
"Fraternally,
"D. De LeOB."...”
|
|
