Your search within this document for 'fusion' resulted in four matching pages.
1

“...Socialist Labor Party should become a real political party, not only a party of prop- aganda. Several Sections, under the leadership of W Rosen- berg and F. Bushe, editor of the Workmen-'s Advocate, the of- ficial p^ty organ^-the American Section of New York among em 00k the stand that the time had arrived for the Social- ists to enter the political arena not here and there and at in- definite periods, but to unfurl the banner of International So- cialism on American soil without compromise or fusion with any other political party. It was here that the New Yorker Volkszeitung did its nefarious work by using its influence to drive both Rosenberg and Bushe out of the party, and all those who stood with them as well. Rosenberg and Bushe thought they had the whole party organization to back them up, and without doubt the majority S infliL r"* But what wa a little tene o organization to the Volkszeitung and its co- movem t t the Socialist movement, who were perhaps Socialists in their younger...”
2

“...L. P. seemed to follow a path top narrow would stand up for more tolerance, broadness, and fusion. Such was Char- les Sotheran, wlho, being somewhat of a spellbinder, made a little fuss for a while. Sotheran, however ridiculous this may sound today, charged De Leon with wanting to establish tac- tics a la Berlin in the American Socialist movement. This was by no means a ridiculous charge then, for in those days Wilhelm Liebknecht was at the helm of the Social Democracy in Germany. Up to the year 1892 there were only eleven Social Democrats in the Reichstag. In that year thirty- six were elected. The Socialist Labor Party of America col- lected $5,000 within six weeks for the 1892 election campaign of the German Social Democracy. The party in Germany had not then voted for war budgets and the Haases* and Scheide- manns were not yet heard of. Sotheran had very few to stand for his Populistic fusion schemes, and he and his and the Socialist Labor Party parted company. The Homestead strike...”
3

“...iency, seeking to hide its weak- nesses behind the skirts of every movement, no matter how absurd, that professed to oppose the powers that be. It was a tail for the Greenback-Labor Party and the United Labor Party, and lost its identity as a Socialist movement in each, until the master hand of De Leon plucked it like a brand from the burning and established it as the only political party in America that was thoroughly self-sufficient and could stand alone, refusing compromise and condemning fusion the undaunted Socialist Labor Party. He gave it a purpose and a goal. He found it a movement in the hands of those, however well meaning, who could not grasp the genius or spirit of American institutions, and who while conforming in dress and manners to American ideas, still kept their thoughts and language in glazed peaked caps and wooden shoes, pat- terning all things political after European models, and en- deavoring to train the young giant of the West in the strict and narrow school of European...”
4

“...interests were endan- gred, arrayed himself against him. Ambition, envy, hatred, malice, and downright dishonesty and ignorance, recogniz- ing that he was the head and front of this movement, as- sailed him personally and sought to stay his hand. But he met them all staunchly and, conscious of the right, fearless- ly pursued his course and left to us a movement whose ene- mies are without and not within. He bequeathed to us a movement self-reliant, confident of itself, scorning compromise and fusion, in harmony with the spirit and progress of American institutions and Amer- ican capitalist development. He gave it a literature and a language all its own, in keeping with its great purpose and sufficient for its great needs. When he entered the party he found Socialism a qualifying adjectiveand he left it a noun. He found it credulous: he left it critical. He found it un- informed, intractable, uncertain, uncouth, un-American, in- articulate, almost dumb, and he left it a movement fit to take...”