Your search within this document for 'Bulgaria' resulted in two matching pages.
1

“...DAKIEL DE LEOXOUR COMRADE. 95 "I have just read your article on the Ferri-Bulgaria search-light, and have passed it on to my assistant with my Papal Imprimaturconsent to be printed. The article gave me great pleasure. Not only is it agree- able to one to see he is understood, but it is especially sooth- ing to me to notice that my martyrdom is realized. It has been a martyrdom to me to see De Leonism run into the ground. There are those whom I call the Knipperdollings of our movement. Such elements are, however sincere, a posi- tive danger to the best of principles. Of course, the Debs party has its Knipperdollings too. But that is no balm to my woundswhich never have been inflicted but by men from within. On October 19, 1907, after having related some of the an- tics of National Secretary Bohn and the Sub-Committee, he added: That this does not conduce to encouragement of me you may well imagine. But it shall not discourage me. I shall face the music. They are a lot of belated Kanglets...”
2

“...WITH DE LEON SINCE 89. 87 the city of Paris. It was at this congress that the Kautsky Resolution was adopted. This resolution, proposed by Karl Kautsky, who posed as the sage of the movement in Ger- many, aye, in all Europe, was voted for by all the parties rep- resented at that congress, with the exception of a few scattered votes from Italy and Bulgaria, the Irish Workers Republican Party, and the Socialist Labor Party of America. M. Millerand, the present [July, 1915] Minister of War in France, was then an active member in the French Socialist movement. To save the Republic he accepted a portfolio in the French ministry, in the same cabinet with General Galliffet. the butcher of the Commune. Jules Guesde and his faction demanded that the International Congress should repudiate Millerandism. Jean Jaures, who at that time had faith in the co-operation of classes," asked for an endorsement of Miller- and s action. Kautskys resolution was to solve the question, was he not the best informed...”