Your search within this document for 'formal' resulted in five matching pages.
1

“...near by. Maycock’s Fort, picturesquely situated in the same | parish, is now bereft of its guns. Treasure is said to be I j buried there, but all endeavours to trace it have failed. |j The bay near by bears the ill-omened name of Hangman’s |, Bay. I Barbados was the first British Colony on which the l| Prince of Wales set foot during his Australian tour in j( H.M.S. Renown in 1920. The Royal Visitor, who was I; welcomed with enthusiasm by the patriotic people of 1 the island, after attending a formal reception in the | Chamber of the House of Assembly, was taken for a drive I through characteristic districts, and in the evening was | entertained at a brilliant ball in the Public Buildings. I In the course of one of the speeches he delivered during l; the day, he said: “ As a naval officer, the King knows j this Colony and the other Islands of the British West Indies well, and His Majesty particularly desired me to p tell you how happy are his memories of the time which | he spent among you...”
2

“...when it received its present name. In 1609 an attempt was made by a company of London merchants to colonise the island, but in less than a year the settlers were driven off by the Caribs. The island was included in the possessions of the French Company of the Islands of America, and in 1650 Du Parquet, the Governor of Martinique, who was a nephew of D’Esnambuc, the first French coloniser in the West Indies, having purchased Grenada, set out for it with two hundred adventurers, and, having taken formal possession of the island, built a fort there and founded the colony. The settlers, who were at first well received, soon quarrelled with the Caribs; but with the aid .of reinforcements from Martinique, the Indians were exterminated. On the northern coast the Mome des Sauteurs is still shown, where many of the Caribs leapt into the sea in order to escape from their enemies. Du Parquet, now in full possession of the island, did not find it profitable, and so in 1656 he sold it to Count de Cerillac...”
3

“...been attributed by the late Dr. G. S. S. Hirst, Commissioner from 1907 to 1912, to the fact that early settlers found alligators, or “ cayman ” as they are still called in Jamaica, in the lesser islands. Another ingenious though less plausible suggestion is that it is derivable from Cay Mano—the cay like a hand. With regard to Cayman Brae, we are told that Brae is synonymous with “ Bluff.” The islands were never occupied by the Spaniards, but were mainly settled by English from Jamaica. Their formal colonisation dates from 1734, between which year and 1741 a number of patents of land were issued. The present inhabitants are mainly the descendants of the original settlers and their servants, as each patentee was com- pelled to carry with him to the island a certain number of white men besides slaves. In 1774 there were, according to Long, one hundred and six white persons on the island of Grand Cayman, who had a " Chief or Governor of their own choosing.” For many years the islands were ...”
4

“...retimbered, and now plies as a mail and passenger boat between St. Croix and the neighbouring islands. Visitors from Frederiksted should make arrangements for meals at Christiansted by telephone beforehand. ST. JOHN A dependency of St. Thomas The small island of St. John—situated about three miles east of St. Thomas—is controlled by the municipality of that island, from which it is separated by Pillsbury Sound. It has an area of 21 square miles, and a popula- tion of 918 only. The Danes took formal possession of it in 1684, but it was not properly settled with respect to population until 1716, when permission was given to sixteen of the inhabitants of St. Thomas to cultivate the island. In the days when sugar was king it contained several very valuable estates, and naturally a much larger population. For instance, at the beginning of...”
5

“...continue the Convention themselves, the only results of the Government's action was that (1) Great Britain lost her right to be repre- sented on the International Sugar Commission at Brussels, and (2) regained the right of granting a preference in the United Kingdom to British colonial sugar as against sugar from the contracting States, which she had renounced by the final Protocol of the Convention of 1902. lhe Convention was denounced by France in 1917, and in 1918 the British Government gave formal notice of the with- drawal of their pledge not to give a tariff preference to Colonial sugar. In 1919 a preference of one-sixth off the duty was: given to British sugar imported into the United Kingdom, and this was increased in 1925 to one-third off the duty and stabilised j...”