Your search within this document for 'due' resulted in five matching pages.
1

“...Plenipotentiaries: — The President of the United States, John Hay, Secretary of State of the United States of America; And His Majesty Edward the Seventh, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and of the British Dominions beyond the Seas, King, and Emperor of India, the Right Honourable Lord Pauncefote, G.C.B., G.C.M.G., His Majesty’s Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the United States; Who, having communicated to each other their full powers, which were found to be in due and proper form, have agreed upon the following articles:— Article I. The high contracting parties agree that the present treaty shall supersede the afore-mentioned convention of the 19th April, 1850. Article II. It is agreed that the canal may be constructed under the auspices of the government of the United States, either directly at its own cost, or by gift or loan of money to individuals or corporations, or through subscription to or purchase of stock and shares, and that, subject to the provisions...”
2

“...guarantee at all times, and for all the Powers, the free use of the Suez Maritime Canal, and thus to complete the system under which the navigation of this canal has been placed by the Firman of His Imperial Majesty the Sultan, dated the 22nd February, 1866 (2 Zilk&dé, 1282), and sanctioning the concessions of His Highness the Khedive, have named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say: — (Here follow the names.} Who, having communicated to each other their respective full powers, found in due and good form, have agreed upon the following articles:— Article I. The Suez Maritime Canal shall always be free and open, in time of war as in time of peace, to every vessel of commerce or of war, without distinction of flag. Consequently, the high contracting parties agree not in any way to interfere with the free use of the canal, in time of war as in time of peace. The canal shall never be subjected to the exercise of the right of blockade. Article II. The high contracting parties, recognising...”
3

“...contracting parties have resolved for that purpose to conclude a convention and have accordingly appointed as their pleni- potentiaries— The President of the United States of America, John Hay, Secretary of State; and The Government of the Republic of Panama, Philippe Bunau- Varilla, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Panama, thereunto specially empowered by said government, who after communicating with each other their res- pective full powers, found to be in good and due form, have agreed upon and concluded the following articles:— Article I. The United States guarantees and will maintain the indepen- dence of the Republic of Panama. Article II. The Republic of Panama grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation, and control of a zone of land and land under water for the construction, maintenance, operation, sanitation, and protection of said canal, of the width often miles extending to the distance of five miles on each side of the centre line...”
4

“...Article XX. If by virtue of any existing treaty in relation to the territory of the Isthmus of Panama, whereof the obligation shall descend or be assumed by the Republic of Panama, there may be any privilege or concession in favour of the government or the citizens and subjects of a third power relative to an interoceanic means of communication which in any of its terms may be incompatible with the terms of the present convention, the Republic of Panama agrees to cancel or modify such treaty in due form, for which purpose it shall give to the third power the requisite notification within the term of four months from the date of the present convention, and in case the existing treaty contains no clause permitting its modification or annulment, the Republic of Panama agrees to procure its modification or annulment in such form that there shall not exist any conflict with the stipulations of the present convention. Article XXI. The rights and privileges granted by the Republic of Panama to the...”
5

“...convinced is the correct one, as to the proper construction of the treaty and the limitations which it imposes upon the United States. I do not find that the bill here in question violates those limitations. On the whole, I believe the bill to be one of the most beneficial that has passed this or any other Congress, and I find no reason in the objections made to the bill which should lead me to delay, until another session of Congress, provisions that are imperatively needed now in order that due preparation by the world may be made for the opening of the canal. Wm. H. Taft. The White House, August 24, 1912....”